Peer review of assignments may be slow and not consistent. Reviewers also do not leave meaningful feedback. It would be much better to make automatic check of programming assignments.

The instructor is great! The course was a bit too basic in my opinion, and even though it targets experienced developers, some basic concepts were explained for too long.

Some of the assignment instructions were unclear. The one that people were most confused about was read.go, but there were others, as I could see from the discussions.

Ok general introduction, some of the code was hard to follow along with because it wouldn't compile as typed, which was a bit confusing, but eventually figured it out.

Current version of Golang is 1.13. The section about project structure and workspace should be updated because now we can use Go module to manage source and packages.

Very good course to getting started with Go. Easy to understand and good assignments for the beginning. Peer-grading the assignments is a point which i don't like.

Would be nice if there were some demo code in *files* specifically that we could download and run? That might be helpful since all demo code given were in snippets.

The course as a beginner will be confused. If you don't have Prior Programming experience then it will be hard to understand the course. Otherwise a Great course.

I think you should explain more about how to code with examples, I didn't have a problem because I have a lot of experience but the new developers will have it.

As a experienced developer wanting to delve into Go, I found the content great. If the assignment descriptions were less ambiguous, this would be a 5 star.

Good, but I had to learn from other resources how to manage my source files, packages and go modules, it would've been nice to have this in the course

Great Course, really enjoyed the lectures! I think the assignments may need to reviewed and made slightly more detailed as there are some ambiguities.

It was a good course but I found out that at one place, syntax was wrong and for complete code I was forced to look up on the internet many times.

Needs updating. Should point to the Go Language's stdlib documentation. I liked how it kind of let you discover how to write the assignments.

Course is good. Peer reviews aren't great. You could have a bot do what other students do. I'd prefer someone experienced to mark my work.

The course was really helpful the only thing is it would be great to cover how to take inputs from the user in various formats.

Peer reviews are sometimes incorrect. One should have an option to get it reviewed again or challenge the already done review.

there are some syntax errors present in the slides and concept taught in the course is not enough to complete some projects .

A nice course designed to deep dive into the basics and also to make sure that some features of the language are also covered.

the course is helpful but to experienced programmer, it has some minor flaws in it but overall it is a good starting point

Peer Evaluated assignments are useless, but the professor teaching method and the course itself is worth the time spent

Some assignments descriptions like string with size 20, were not clear/maybe copied from other language assignments.

i think teacher should give more example, the exercise needs some package, command that wasn't mentioned in course

los compañeros me calificaron mal solo por el idioma teniendo sin tener en cuenta que los algoritmos estaban bien.

Fisrt course of Programming with Google Go specialization, complete all homework won't be a problem for learner.