Chevron Left
Back to Planning a Patient Safety or Quality Improvement Project (Patient Safety III)

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Planning a Patient Safety or Quality Improvement Project (Patient Safety III) by Johns Hopkins University

4.8
stars
163 ratings

About the Course

This course provides students with a set of tools and methodologies to plan and initiate a Problem Solving or Quality Improvement project. The first module presents methods for selecting, scoping and structuring a project before it is even initiated. It also introduces the project classifications of implementation and discovery. The second module describes the A3 problem solving methodology and the tool itself. Further in that same module, the student is shown tools to identify problems in flow, defects, and waste and to discover causes, brainstorm, and prioritize interventions. Module 3 shows a methodology within the implementation class. These methods are designed to overcome emotional and organizational barriers to translating evidence-based interventions into practice. The fourth and last module looks at one more way to approach improvement projects in the discovery class. These tools are specifically for new, out-of-the-box design thinking....

Top reviews

NA

May 21, 2020

The assignment looked easy and simple at first. But when you started working on it and saw how it was being scored, it was way more comprehensive than I thought. Job well done to organising team!

M

Aug 18, 2020

This course is really helpful in planning the project. It will make you brainstorm yourself and you will eventually end up doing the project by yourself. It really boosted up my confidence.

Filter by:

26 - 30 of 30 Reviews for Planning a Patient Safety or Quality Improvement Project (Patient Safety III)

By TALAL M A A T M A A

•

May 6, 2023

excellent

By Mona A A

•

Jun 2, 2021

good

By ZAYAD K A A Z K A A

•

May 7, 2023

ex

By NADER A O A N A O A

•

May 7, 2023

e

By Warren W G

•

Jun 21, 2022

This course was informative, but something needs to change for the Peer Review Assignment. Many of the other students do not grade properly, and it is obvious that they do not speak or read English as their primary fluency. This is a big issue, as when as assignment is graded, the scoring is sporadic and inconsistent, resulting in a poor grade average. Peer Review Assignments should additionally be reviewed by a Professor or adjunct professor to ensure impartiality, accuracy, and consistency.