The course had helped in understanding the concepts of NumPy and pandas. The assignments were so helpful to apply these concepts which provide an in-depth understanding of the Numpy as well as pandans
overall the good introductory course of python for data science but i feel it should have covered the basics in more details .specially for the ones who do not have any prior programming background .
By Henrique R•
Explanations are superficial, and it relies too heavily on self-learning. For that I can simply check Python's documentation without paying the course's monthly fee.
By Miryam V•
There is no helpful guide to the tasks, you don't know the results in advance so you don't know if you are doing well or not.
Tedious and you don't learn anything.
Course material was presented pretty simply without examples that related to the programming assignments. Didn't provide me with the tools I wanted it to.
By Will W•
This course has many errors and bugs in its materials. I don't know why the administrators refuse to fix it but it comes off as shoddy and poorly managed.
By Victoria S•
the lectures are not helpful at all, assignments were organised poorly - there impossible to see mistakes, in other words- go break your head over it
By ILLIA S•
Corrupted or outdated data in week 3 and week 4. Hidden tests that fail and you can't get the reason...
Besides of that - the material given is good
By Dheeraj a•
The instructor teaches you very liitle and expects you to do thing of your own.It was the worst course i have done until now.The instructor is mad.
By Zain R•
The pacing for the course is horrendous, this class quickly becomes impossible to do without looking up answers as the lectures do not help at all
By Azima A•
The Course is too general, not going into details of how codes should be written. In order to pass the assignments you need to separately study.
By Chris M•
Unclear assignments, lectures are brief and sometimes unclear. Spent more time trying to understand what was being asked than actually learning.
By Egbeola A•
The lectures videos were poorly structured, the only good things were the assignment which on its own can teach better than the lecturers
By Daniel V•
The course material is good, but the auto-grader does not work properly. Most time on week 3 assignment is debuggin this auto-correcter.
By Brian V S•
Very knowledgeable professors, but very little explanation or actual 'teaching'. Graded assignments require a lot of self-education.
By rachel l•
Not much information for beginners without a coding background. Assignments are impossible given the video tutorials we have.
By Adithya S•
it is very hard for beginners to understand!! More example type teaching is required than simply dictating the theories.
By Ravi T•
The instuctor is too slow and the way of teaching could be made more interactive and interesting , like CS50 of Harvard
By Allen T•
Time spent != Learning Benefit. Assignment #3 is a waste of time. Week 3 Lecture and assignment #3 were unrelated.
By Diwakar S•
teacher is good but talks way too fast. hard to follow especially data science concepts at that speed
By Vishnu S K•
The Class is too fast and not explained in an understandable manner. Programming is also very fast.
By Lovish b•
I HAVE NO IDEA WHY IT ALWAYS KEEPS REJECTING MY WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT. WELL I AM NOT TRYING AGAIN NOW
By Shailvi S•
Not an introductory course. They don't even teach like you're a beginner. Very very unsatisfied.
By Priata N•
Not a very good instructor or course. Course topics are good. I had to learn from other sources.
By Xavier P C•
Very poor material compared to what you are asked to do on the assignments. A waste of money
My project is stuck because of silly code validation, can some one look into it urgently
By Santiago T J•
The content they give in the videos is not enough to perform the tasks they propose.