Learner Reviews & Feedback for Data Collection and Processing with Python by University of Michigan
About the Course
Top reviews
Very interesting and fine course, in this course I learn how to solve Nested data and new a new thing i.e REST API which seems best in course 3 now I am excited about course 4. Thanking you Michigan
This was a really excellent course. The functional project at the end helped me understand how recommendation systems work and now I'm very excited to try to build a similar system for books I love.
476 - 500 of 501 Reviews for Data Collection and Processing with Python
By LIBIN W
•good course but concepts in 3rd week was a real quickie.
By Yash R
•feedback: week 3 modules were not structured properly.
By Иван И
•Sufferings with final tests ( partially outdated )
By PRANAV G
•Should bs focused more on requests module and API
By LifeExp
•cannot access many of APIs used during the course
By Jason B
•Really could have used more practice exercises.
By Yagna Y N
•please provide detailed information in project
By Yuhao W
•Week 3 and the final project is toooooo hard!
By Bohdan K V
•The last assignment as always awful!
By Ioannis K
•Runestone has a lot of bugs...
By Md. F K
•Kind of complex to understand
By ASIF S
•the tests are too tough
By Noel D
•More support needed!
By Yueduxin W
•too hard!!!!!
By 손승건
•not bad
By Weerachai Y
•thanks
By Vaidehi B R
•good
By Hernan D
•I did the course one and two from the specialization in python 3 which are really great courses. In this course 3, the first part was fine but the APIs part of the course was really incomplete and it would have been much better If the instructors had given more exercises. Another things that is very bad is the final project, although the first five exercises were ok the exercise six failed most of the time and the teachers do not answer any of my questions.
By Ching-hsiu L
•This course gives learners the skill which learners can not take away. I am disappointed that we can not apply what we learn, requests_with_caching, while we leave Runestone interactive for other Python environment. In addition, it is not a good instructional design that this course takes 3 weeks to teach only one method.
By Cristhian E J
•I think you need more practice to be able to accomplish the final test . Paul Resnick great teacher though!
By Jorge L
•Awful experience with the last assignment, must fix all the Runestone bugs as soon as possible!
By William R
•I loved all the previous courses, but this one was frustrating, not for the difficulty of the tasks, but because of the week 3, you need to keep the student excercising before the project or it comes almost impossible to do the task.
When I started coding for the project I did not know where to start, I needed some practice and there is not a single excercise in the Runnestone for the student to develop the knowdledge on the topic as the previous courses.
Thats my feedback, you guys are great but you should improve that to help students understand better the APIS topic, it was extremely frustrating. I was waiting for the first time I could do a code from my own and the first time coding CAN NOT be in middle of the project.
By Mohammad H
•Unfortunately this course was not good at all compared to the rest of them. They didn't have energy to teach, and just skipped over the API, the Runstone project has a lot of errors, so you can't keep up. The teaching staff does not reply to your questions, it was a mess in General. Waste of time, all my codes were correct but the runstone project showed it was wrong, until I logged in again at night, used the same code, then it worked.
By Tymur L
•Don't liked this course. Too easy. In the final lesson only few api's are studied. The only useful thing really I have been told is looking up the docs. I knew it prior to taking this course.
By juan s c g
•Good the idea in the final exam but bad doing it due to the change of the server page please fix that problem and make some changes to solve that errors.
Coursera Footer
