Chevron Left
Back to Agile Software Development

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Agile Software Development by University of Minnesota

4.7
stars
3,726 ratings
891 reviews

About the Course

Software industry is going crazy on agile methods. It is rapidly becoming the choice for software development where requirements are unpredictable or is expected to change over time. This course will help you gain knowledge on what is agile? Why agile is better suited for these situations? We will also cover some of the most common agile frameworks like scrum and XP in depth. Prerequisite: You need basic knowledge of software development process and software development methodologies. After completing this course, you will be able to : 1) Demonstrate the ability to participate effectively in agile practices/process for software development. 2) Explain the purpose behind common agile practices. 3) Ability to apply agile principles and values to a given situation. 4) Ability to identify and address most common problems encountered in adopting Agile methods. Project: You will also be given opportunity to apply what you learn in this course. You will be given fictional case studies, where after studying the case study, you will have to exercise some of the practices, techniques, etc that team members of an agile team members are expected to know....

Top reviews

SS
Jul 14, 2019

One of the best course for Agile software methodology in order to understand each role and responsibility. It also describes the definition of the terms which are widely being used in Agile framework

PC
Sep 28, 2020

Agile will really help us in different aspects of Developing the Software with proper approach and proper planning. And this course is very helpful for us in growing in the Project management side.

Filter by:

901 - 925 of 927 Reviews for Agile Software Development

By POOJA T

Apr 14, 2020

,.

By M V R C

Sep 22, 2021

By Abijith M

Aug 10, 2021

By pitambar s

Aug 19, 2020

G

By Pavan P

Aug 4, 2020

g

By PRATHAMESH K

Jun 1, 2020

.

By VARSHA K S

May 12, 2020

G

By Ramu B

May 5, 2020

I

By Paul G

Oct 4, 2020

Content was relevant. It could have been delivered in a more varied and engaging way. Different subject matter experts presenting on different topics. Accent very difficult to understand at times. Some of the assessment exercises focused on content that was barely covered while key elements seemed to get minimal focus at times. The level of plagiarism and copying evident in some of the peer-reviewed work was concerning.

By Ashok H

Mar 2, 2020

I have taken the two start out due to the issues of assignment and grading. For the online course, assignment and peer grading may not be the best options and if the university re-look that aspects and stick to the online quizes to certify then it makes a great experience. Course content is good.

By Sven P

Apr 13, 2021

For an intermediate course I found the info too easy and lightweight. The longer the course takes the more it got fragmented and the host seems to loose enthusiasm over time. Videos snippets always follow same pattern.

By Shabnam S

Jun 12, 2020

The course was ok but the Peer Review assignment was very detailedly asked which was not that detailed in the Course videos

By Kaushal P

Feb 25, 2020

The course could be more interactive with input from the learner during the lectures

By Aakrati G

Aug 26, 2020

Good with Basic Concept

By Jagdish C

Apr 16, 2021

super

By sai p

Nov 1, 2020

good

By Roseline

Jun 18, 2020

fine

By RIYA M

May 29, 2020

Okay

By kartik k

Jul 21, 2020

N

By Marcelo H G

Jun 2, 2019

I already did several courses, in loco and remote, about agile. Only one was really nice. Why not showing a quick theater of a day by day scrum team? Scenes of starting the day, receiving a new project, studying together, sprint planing, planing poker and a daily scrum. We don't need the review and retrospective because there are similar to any other way of dealing with project but It is crucial to see the things happening. Why not interview or show a quick activity of an scrum team? Ask gitlab, github, google, some of them will allow a quick recording of a generic activity. The lack of real world agile make this course really a dummy one.

By SSS

Apr 10, 2020

The course material was vague and dilute. Questions frequently sought answers which were not provided by the course material. I felt incredibly unprepared for the assignments, owing to the poor instruction. A person would be using their time more wisely simply following a structured approach to learning about Agile through other web resources.

By Sofiia R

Sep 30, 2020

I didn't find the specialization and this course in particular useful. It has low quality videos, unstructured information, and doesn't give enough knowledge to start working.

Also, the last course of the specialization requires background in programming, otherwise you will not be able to complete the specialization.

By Chandler H

Nov 13, 2020

The instructor never really used their industry experience to make the class unique. It was basically ready slides and memorizing vocab. Also, the instructor kept saying "he" when referring to software developers.

By Tiêu A T

Feb 9, 2021

this course is just a repeat of all the information of the previous course of this specialization. The instructor shows no passion, he just read all the script, which can easily found anywhere on the internet. Moreover, the instructor read the script with a really boring voice, like he almost falls to asleep during the lecture, if anyone wants to pay for this course, I recommend just read the syllabus and find all the information on google, clearly more effective, and less time consuming than participate in this course. Coursera has many good and well build course, but not this course. Please consider carefully before pay for this poorly build course

By Nayera M

Apr 20, 2020

The course material is very poor and most of the time the lecturer is just reading the slide. Not worth the money. Also, the last assignment grading process is ridiculous people are not providing reliable grades and such useless feedback.