A very good courser, especially for people like me that have a lot experience in coding c program but want to learn something more to advance my career. I'll recommend this course to my friend.
I liked it, it costed me a little because I am not a C programmer with big experience, and this course I feel is focused on C programmers that want to know how to "translate" their code to C++
By Joyal F T•
Take this course only if you have a very good understanding of c and data structures
By Deep P•
This course very helpful to me the better theory lesson and explanation.
By Subhodip C•
Peer graded assignment checking system doesn't seem quite right to me.
By Poon H W•
Tutor's tone will bring you into sleep, but the content is good
By Akash S•
i learnt a lot of things i did not know before.
By Yusong Z•
Mediocre, too much graph theory, too less C++ feature
By Ammara S N•
it is a good course and very helpful to us
By Tanushree v•
good course but trainer doesnt go in deep
By Lokesh H S•
The english they speak is hard to get
By METAGAR B S•
It's amazing course helped me lot
By Jayaynth P S Y•
Focus on history can be reduced.
By Deleted A•
Wasn't for me, I suppose
little bit confusing
By Vimal K D•
Not much working
By YC X•
Not that detail.
By SHWETHA B K S•
By NEERADI C S•
By Pushpendra H•
By Tuo L•
I gave this course two star for taking my responsibility. The course is bad designed. The homework has less clue and you may only find 50% or less related knowledge from the lectures. The final quiz is ridiculous (too many questions about number calculation and I cannot believe there are questions like what did D. Ritchie B. Stroustrup E. Dijkstra L. Euler do or invent?!!!). It seems that the professor or his assistant did not put too much effort into providing this course. Though I learned something from it and it pushed me to learn several c++ skills, in a google searching way.
By Dimitris K•
The video sessions are nice and very informative. However, the examples in the videos are a "toy" compared to the assignment of implementing a Monte Carlo simulation for Dijkstra's algo. The directions in the description of the assignment are very poorly written and the specs are blurry and difficult to clarify by yourself. The MST assignment is much easier, but still the directions are not well prepared.
no Chinese subtitles and it is really hard for me to figure all the English subtitles and knowledge. I feel that upset concerning no Chinese translation and I think it should be improved sooner or later. or Chinese learners like me would not learn as much as students who have English as their mother languages.
By Nadav S•
Very superficial. I found that I know c++ to a limited extent, and that for practical uses I must learn a significant amount of information from other sources. In short, this course is an introduction but does not give you enough tools to call yourself a c++ programmer.
By Amit J•
The instructor speaks too slow. Teaching concepts that are not valid anymore. e.g. prefer inline over function call, const vs #define, declaring variable anywhere in the code etc...
The topics are too small and too much time is devoted to them.
By Nishchaya B•
The instructor is way too boring. I've tried hard to watch these lectures at least thrice but I loose interest after a while. There's a lack of energy and no connection with the audience.
By Vedanth R•
Very low effort put in designing the course. Lecture content is not useful for the most part. Assignments are peer-reviewed instead of designing test-cases.