I liked it, it costed me a little because I am not a C programmer with big experience, and this course I feel is focused on C programmers that want to know how to "translate" their code to C++
Just right for programmers seeking to update their skills to the new V11 C++. I recommend getting the book by the author that helps along with a text or Coursera course on Algorithms.
By Lokesh H S•
The english they speak is hard to get
By METAGAR B S•
It's amazing course helped me lot
By Jayaynth P S Y•
Focus on history can be reduced.
By Deleted A•
Wasn't for me, I suppose
little bit confusing
By Vimal K D•
Not much working
By YC X•
Not that detail.
By SHWETHA B K S•
By NEERADI C S•
By Pushpendra H•
By Tuo L•
I gave this course two star for taking my responsibility. The course is bad designed. The homework has less clue and you may only find 50% or less related knowledge from the lectures. The final quiz is ridiculous (too many questions about number calculation and I cannot believe there are questions like what did D. Ritchie B. Stroustrup E. Dijkstra L. Euler do or invent?!!!). It seems that the professor or his assistant did not put too much effort into providing this course. Though I learned something from it and it pushed me to learn several c++ skills, in a google searching way.
By Dimitris K•
The video sessions are nice and very informative. However, the examples in the videos are a "toy" compared to the assignment of implementing a Monte Carlo simulation for Dijkstra's algo. The directions in the description of the assignment are very poorly written and the specs are blurry and difficult to clarify by yourself. The MST assignment is much easier, but still the directions are not well prepared.
no Chinese subtitles and it is really hard for me to figure all the English subtitles and knowledge. I feel that upset concerning no Chinese translation and I think it should be improved sooner or later. or Chinese learners like me would not learn as much as students who have English as their mother languages.
By Nadav S•
Very superficial. I found that I know c++ to a limited extent, and that for practical uses I must learn a significant amount of information from other sources. In short, this course is an introduction but does not give you enough tools to call yourself a c++ programmer.
By Amit J•
The instructor speaks too slow. Teaching concepts that are not valid anymore. e.g. prefer inline over function call, const vs #define, declaring variable anywhere in the code etc...
The topics are too small and too much time is devoted to them.
By Nishchaya B•
The instructor is way too boring. I've tried hard to watch these lectures at least thrice but I loose interest after a while. There's a lack of energy and no connection with the audience.
By Vedanth R•
Very low effort put in designing the course. Lecture content is not useful for the most part. Assignments are peer-reviewed instead of designing test-cases.
By Asterios K•
Lots of overlap in the videos, not a lot of information on C++ features, too few hands-on activities with the features taught.
By PANNAGA U•
Not good he talks in a mood that the doesn't like teching us so not able to understand some concepts
By Ranip H•
Very poorly designed course material. Everything has been split up.
By MANOJ M•
please enroll if you got some basic knowledge in c++
By AISHWARYA H R 1•
lengthy videos must be shortened.....
By KUSUMA D•
It is not interesting.
By Jong B P•
Not organized well.
By MANISH K S•